Comments for DORIFRIEND.com -geeky SEO Tips and Training

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by phil

phil — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:13:28 +0000

I’d never thought about it before but it just makes sense! Google have such a birdseye view of the net why wouldn’t they be looking at registrations!?
Be interesting to see the results of your testing Dori

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by kenneth

kenneth — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:56:25 +0000

~~< a href = …~~

????? ?? ???? …

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by jorge

jorge — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 03:34:01 +0000

poor@ugjtw8.egg” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info …

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by dkelso

dkelso — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:11:47 +0000

Thanks for the share Dori. This seems to be also working for .net domains quite nicely too. We have found that when putting up a site (either WordPress or SEO Toaster), and we create anchor text links between pages (for those pages best respective keyword phrases), and also have a nice health ping list, big G indexes all those pages with pages interlinking.

Wrap a nice little mininet around the pages over the first 4-6 weeks and ignite the bombfire with the rest of your links after this time – ranking for your core phrases becomes a breeze

Cheers – Dallas Kelso

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by Dori

Dori — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:03:54 +0000

@thenewb, my tests are showing they are indexing more then just index page. And that is where internal structure will help.
@Denvernetmarketing, depends on my goal. If I want to rank an inner page, or push authority through my site then yes, I still inner link.
@raddie, yep, in my tests if we didn’t put a site on it, it stayed un-indexed.

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by raddie

raddie — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:51:16 +0000

I had a theory that new sites set up as soon as bought the domain seemed be getting registered quicker than those sites on urls which get bought and then I don’t get around to building a site on for a month or two. I guess that explains why?

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by Denvernetmarketing

Denvernetmarketing — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:18:12 +0000

I meant would you wait for the pages to be crawled naturally once Google realizes your site is live?

sorry

http://denvernetmarketing.com/

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by Denvernetmarketing

Denvernetmarketing — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:17:23 +0000

Dori

Would you still recommend linking to individual pages just for indexing purposes or would you way for the pages to be crawled naturally once Google realizes your site is live?

http://denvernetmarketing.com/

Comment on Indexing a New Site: Test Results by thenewb

thenewb — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:56:46 +0000

Hey dori, humm… too bad they don’t also seem to automatically index all the pages of indexed sites….

Comment on Google Algorithm Change Launched.. and Felt! by Claude5670

Claude5670 — Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:10:36 +0000

I had a good money site original content natural back links ranked number three for two years now, January 12 Google hit it hard,went down to position 330 now back up to position 50 this is not a exact match domain, by the way. I don’t quite understand I have what I would consider crappy sites that were unaffected.

What really gets me I have a competitor who is now in position 3 with auto generated content and a really visible linking scheme (I mean come on)

I am keeping a close eye on many auto generated content sites to see if yesterday’s announcement will affect them.

February 24
But in the last day or so we launched a pretty big algorithmic improvement to our ranking—a change that noticeably impacts 11.8% of our queries—and we wanted to let people know what’s going on. This update is designed to reduce rankings for low-quality sites—sites which are low-value add for users, copy content from other websites or sites that are just not very useful.

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html